Just the 'usual' cooling (no fluid etc)Ī picture of the computer is located here,. ZOTAC NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX1080 ti 11GB GDDR5X. Intel® Core™ i7-7700 3.60 GHz Kaby Lake Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz). I thought of getting an Aftershock PC with these specs but was advised (by the guy at the store) that it would not be good for rendering: From what I read here, it's more GPU than CPU, while PSU and cooling may play a part. I'm very close to purchasing a new computer to hop onto the Iray train. So how unusual are these times? Based on what I've indicated am I clearly doing something wrong? There are no lights in the scene at all, headlamp is set to 12%, included sky & dome set to 6:30 PM - that's it. I converted all the shaders, and replaced them with IRay presets when possible (what I see so far does look great). What are the average times most people are seeing? It's a relatively simple scene, one character (admittedly wearing a lot of layered clothing) and a stained glass window as the background (the window is simply a 2D image set in a simple wall - it's not rendering as glass or anything). 
So I guess I'm really wondering wondering how substandard my machine is.
I'm only running with one dual core and an Nvidia GeForce GT 625. I know my machine is substandard (the same picture at twice the rez (1754 x 2480) took 16 hours in Reality 4 - and that was only 500 passes). I have a general question about render times in IRay.īasically, I have my first IRay render going now, it's not that large (877 x 1240), and it's been running almost 11 hours now, and it's still very grainy, and only on IRay iteration 11 (0%).
0 kommentar(er)
